True, or psyop? U.S. won't ratify UN treaty that could have outlawed civilian firearms ownership

Tuesday, September 04, 2012 by: J. D. Heyes
Tags: firearms ownership, Second Amendment, UN treaty

eTrust Pro Certified

Most Viewed Articles
Popular on Facebook
CDC issues flu vaccine apology: this year's vaccine doesn't work!
The five biggest lies about Ebola being pushed by government and mass media
Ultraviolet light robot kills Ebola in two minutes; why doesn't every hospital have one of these?
Tetanus vaccines found spiked with sterilization chemical to carry out race-based genocide against Africans
Biologist explains how marijuana causes tumor cells to commit suicide
Companies begin planting microchips under employees' skin
The best way to help your body protect itself against Ebola (or any virus or bacteria)
NJ cops bust teenagers shoveling snow without a permit
Russia throws down the gauntlet: energy supply to Europe cut off; petrodollar abandoned as currency war escalates
McDonald's in global profit free fall as people everywhere increasingly reject chemically-altered toxic fast food
W.H.O. contradicts CDC, admits Ebola can spread via coughing, sneezing and by touching contaminated surfaces
Top ten things you need to do NOW to protect yourself from an uncontrolled Ebola outbreak
Chemotherapy kills cancer patients faster than no treatment at all
FDA targets Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps for sharing health benefits of coconut oil
U2's Bono partners with Monsanto to destroy African agriculture with GMOs
Why flu shots are the greatest medical fraud in history
Governments seize colloidal silver being used to treat Ebola patients, says advocate
Flu vaccine kills 13 in Italy; death toll rises

(NaturalNews) Constitutionalism is certainly in danger in America, but at least it's not completely dead yet. Chalk one up for our founding document.

Case in point. Remember our recent story regarding the impending defeat of the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST)? 34 U.S. senators, we reported, have agreed to oppose it, effectively killing it for the time being.

Treaties, you may know, require the approval of more than two-thirds of the Senate - 67 members - to pass. You may also know that treaties carry the force of law; a treaty has the same authority as any bill passed by Congress and signed by the president (or passed over a president's veto).

The LOST agreement is a particularly bad treaty for the United States, for it would subject the most free nation on earth (for the time being) to the will of unelected global bureaucrats at the United Nations.

Thugs like Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, Cuba's Fidel Castro, Zimbabwe's Robert Mugabe and a hundred other tyrants and petty tyrants would suddenly control much of our country's foreign policy. The agreement would also "require American businesses to pay royalties for resource exploitation and subject the U.S. to unwieldy environmental regulations as defined," the Washington Times reported, citing critics of the treaty.

"With 34 senators against the misguided treaty, LOST will not be ratified by the Senate this year," Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., said after the magic number was reached in mid-July.

The agreement that won't go away

Sen. John Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, had said he planned to bring ratification of the treaty to a vote, thus sparking the opposition.

For his part, Kerry is downplaying DeMint's declaration that the number of opponents is a deal-breaker for LOST.

"No letter or whip count changes the fact that rock-ribbed Republican businesses and the military and every living Republican secretary of state say that this needs to happen, and that's why it's a matter of 'when' not 'if' for the Law of the Sea," Kerry's spokeswoman, Jodi Seth, told the Times.

She added that Kerry had already decided to postpone a vote this year because "right now we're in the middle of a white-hot political campaign season where ideology is running in overdrive."

"That's why Sen. Kerry made it clear from day one that there wouldn't be a vote before the election and until everyone's had the chance to evaluate the treaty on the facts and the merits away from the politics of the moment," she said.

The "facts" are this treaty has been around for about three decades, and it is still languishing in the Senate. That suggests only enemies of liberty remain interested in getting it passed.

But there are more "international" threats to American sovereignty looming out there, giving credence to a phrase attributed to Thomas Jefferson that "the price of freedom is eternal vigilance."

At the moment, our State Department is negotiating with UN-member states over an agreement known as the Arms Trade Treaty, or ATT, an agreement that would likely expose records of American gun owners to foreign governments and, say critics, put the Second Amendment on trial (surprisingly, one of the main players in these "negotiations" is Iran, which has been accused of heaping weapons on Syria's rebel opposition and feeding the civil war there).

According to reports, ATT supporters say the aim of the treaty is to reign in unregulated guns that killed an estimated 1,500 people daily. But before you nod approvingly at the utopian intent of this effort, think about the free-fire zone that is Chicago - and recall that is a city with some of the toughest gun laws in the country.

George W. Bush, as president, opposed a 2006 UN General Assembly resolution launching the treaty process; President Obama decided the U.S. would participate but only if the agreement was reached by consensus, giving any of the 193 member states an effective veto.

Assault on your liberties will continue

While that may seem like a sure-fire way to ensure the treaty never passes, it is not as strong as Bush's non-participation because it still opens the door to future passage, say critics.

Most Americans - and, thankfully, most U.S. senators - are rightfully wary.

American citizens "don't want the UN to be acting as a global nanny with a global permission slip stating whether they can own a gun or not," says National Rifle Association executive vice president Wayne LaPierre.

"It cheapens our rights as American citizens, and weakens our sovereignty," he told Fox News.

That message seems to be resonating in Washington. In an election year especially, few want to be seen as being on the wrong side of such a hot-button constitutional issue.

"Democratic senators who face close re-election bids in conservative states are reluctant to go on the record supporting such a treaty, which gun rights activists say is an attempt by the Obama administration to bypass Congress to implement highly unpopular gun control measures," said a report in

"58 senators, including 13 Democrats, have signed a letter stating they are opposed to the small arms treaty," the report said.

As it should be. But like the LOST treaty, don't expect this additional assault on your liberties to just fade away.


Join over four million monthly readers. Your privacy is protected. Unsubscribe at any time.
comments powered by Disqus
Take Action: Support by linking back to this article from your website

Permalink to this article:

Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):

Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use OK, cite with clickable link.

Follow Natural News on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, and Pinterest

Colloidal Silver

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Support NaturalNews Sponsors:

Advertise with NaturalNews...


Sign up for the FREE Natural News Email Newsletter

Receive breaking news on GMOs, vaccines, fluoride, radiation protection, natural cures, food safety alerts and interviews with the world's top experts on natural health and more.

Join over 7 million monthly readers of, the internet's No. 1 natural health news site. (Source:

Your email address *

Please enter the code you see above*

No Thanks

Already have it and love it!

Natural News supports and helps fund these organizations:

* Required. Once you click submit, we will send you an email asking you to confirm your free registration. Your privacy is assured and your information is kept confidential. You may unsubscribe at anytime.