USDA conspires with factory chicken producers to reduce inspections, speed factory output

Saturday, August 11, 2012 by: J. D. Heyes
Tags: chicken factories, safety inspections, USDA

eTrust Pro Certified

Most Viewed Articles
Popular on Facebook
CDC issues flu vaccine apology: this year's vaccine doesn't work!
The five biggest lies about Ebola being pushed by government and mass media
Ultraviolet light robot kills Ebola in two minutes; why doesn't every hospital have one of these?
Tetanus vaccines found spiked with sterilization chemical to carry out race-based genocide against Africans
Biologist explains how marijuana causes tumor cells to commit suicide
Companies begin planting microchips under employees' skin
The best way to help your body protect itself against Ebola (or any virus or bacteria)
NJ cops bust teenagers shoveling snow without a permit
Russia throws down the gauntlet: energy supply to Europe cut off; petrodollar abandoned as currency war escalates
McDonald's in global profit free fall as people everywhere increasingly reject chemically-altered toxic fast food
W.H.O. contradicts CDC, admits Ebola can spread via coughing, sneezing and by touching contaminated surfaces
Top ten things you need to do NOW to protect yourself from an uncontrolled Ebola outbreak
Chemotherapy kills cancer patients faster than no treatment at all
FDA targets Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps for sharing health benefits of coconut oil
U2's Bono partners with Monsanto to destroy African agriculture with GMOs
Why flu shots are the greatest medical fraud in history
Governments seize colloidal silver being used to treat Ebola patients, says advocate
Flu vaccine kills 13 in Italy; death toll rises

(NaturalNews) The federal agency responsible for conducting food inspections has announced a new proposal to screen chickens for disease and contaminates, but the measure has some industry analysts concerned because it would reduce the number of inspectors at processing plants.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture's proposed change would mean inspectors at poultry plants would be reduced from four to one and instead rely more on plant employees to fill in and perform more inspection duties.

The USDA's Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS), said the changes would "ensure and even enhance the safety of the poultry supply by focusing our inspectors' efforts on activities more directly tied to improving food safety," agency spokesman Dirk Fillpot said in a statement.

The USDA says the measure is necessary to modernize food inspection while saving taxpayers and the poultry industry money. Rather than peering over production lines, remaining FSIS inspectors would instead focus on issues that pose the greatest health risks to the public, according to reports.

Food safety advocates are, well, crying fowl. They say the plan is filled with negative ramifications, mostly because they say the remaining FSIS inspectors will have virtually no time to inspect the billions of chickens processed each year. In a report about the proposed change, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution put that time at about one-third of a second, because in addition to reducing the number of inspectors, the proposal speeds up production lines by about 25 percent.

Also, they worry that the proposal will create a conflict of interest; in a bid to push profits even higher, advocates fear plant managers will skimp on any process - including the inspection process - that would increase expenditures.

"I went out and bought a food processor so we could make more vegetarian meals," Felicia Nestor, a food safety advocate and a consultant with the Government Accountability Project. "If the changes go into effect, my husband and I will no longer buy chicken."

Advocates say the plan could leave "gaping holes" in poultry safety inspection, and could wind up endangering the entire population; most Americans eat an average of 80 pounds of poultry a year.

Changes will save a little taxpayer money, but are they worth it?

The USDA has not said when the proposed changes would take effect. The agency also said that the proposals are voluntary, but industry analysts said all but the smallest plants would opt in so they could remain competitive, the AJC reported.

Among the changes:

-- Place plant workers in chicken and turkey farms on the conveyor belts where bad birds are taken off the line; currently four FSIS inspectors are on such lines, but again, the proposals reduce that number to just one.

-- Let plants decide how much training their workers need in order to be able satisfactorily spot diseased or defective birds.

-- Let plants speed up production lines, meaning that the sole FSIS inspector at the end of the line will have to visually inspect as many as 175 birds a minute (currently the maximum speed is 140 per minute, but remember, that is divided out over four inspectors, who inspect some 35 per minute).

In the era of trillion-dollar deficits, every little bit of savings the stewards of taxpayer money can squeeze out of the federal budget is appreciated. But in this case, it's a rounding error; the USDA projects the savings to taxpayers would only be about $90 million in three years.

Poultry plants, the agency says, are bigger winners; they will reap savings of $256 million annually.

Fewer regulations, sure, but less incentive to do the right thing

Caroline Smith DeWaal, director of food safety for the Center for Science in the Public Interest, is critical.

"All they've done is remove regulations. They haven't replaced them with better standards," she told the Atlanta paper.

David Barrett, a federal inspector assigned to poultry plants in Gainesville, said he worked in plants as a young man, and knows how the system operates.

"They don't like it when we slow the lines down," he said. "You think they're going to allow their own people to do it?"

That sentiment was summed up in a June Los Angeles Times story about the proposed changes.

"Unlike bona fide government inspectors, plant employees will be all too aware that whenever they pull a product off the line, they're costing money to the company that employs them," the paper said. "So even if the owners and managers are scrupulous about not pressuring employees, there's a built-in incentive to let marginal problems pass through."


Join over four million monthly readers. Your privacy is protected. Unsubscribe at any time.
comments powered by Disqus
Take Action: Support by linking back to this article from your website

Permalink to this article:

Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):

Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use OK, cite with clickable link.

Follow Natural News on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, and Pinterest

Colloidal Silver

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Support NaturalNews Sponsors:

Advertise with NaturalNews...


Sign up for the FREE Natural News Email Newsletter

Receive breaking news on GMOs, vaccines, fluoride, radiation protection, natural cures, food safety alerts and interviews with the world's top experts on natural health and more.

Join over 7 million monthly readers of, the internet's No. 1 natural health news site. (Source:

Your email address *

Please enter the code you see above*

No Thanks

Already have it and love it!

Natural News supports and helps fund these organizations:

* Required. Once you click submit, we will send you an email asking you to confirm your free registration. Your privacy is assured and your information is kept confidential. You may unsubscribe at anytime.