cancer

FDA Questions Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Drug

Friday, August 13, 2010 by: Megan Rostollan
Tags: breast cancer, drugs, health news

eTrust Pro Certified

Most Viewed Articles
Popular on Facebook
CDC issues flu vaccine apology: this year's vaccine doesn't work!
Tetanus vaccines found spiked with sterilization chemical to carry out race-based genocide against Africans
Biologist explains how marijuana causes tumor cells to commit suicide
Companies begin planting microchips under employees' skin
NJ cops bust teenagers shoveling snow without a permit
Russia throws down the gauntlet: energy supply to Europe cut off; petrodollar abandoned as currency war escalates
McDonald's in global profit free fall as people everywhere increasingly reject chemically-altered toxic fast food
Chemotherapy kills cancer patients faster than no treatment at all
U2's Bono partners with Monsanto to destroy African agriculture with GMOs
FDA targets Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps for sharing health benefits of coconut oil
Why flu shots are the greatest medical fraud in history
Flu vaccine kills 13 in Italy; death toll rises
600 strains of an aerosolized thought control vaccine already tested on humans; deployed via air, food and water
Italian court rules mercury and aluminum in vaccines cause autism: US media continues total blackout of medical truth
The 21 curious questions we're never allowed to ask about vaccines
Vicious attack on Dr. Oz actually waged by biotech mafia; plot to destroy Oz launched after episode on glyphosate toxicity went viral
CDC admits it has been lying all along about Ebola transmission; "indirect" spread now acknowledged
Orthorexia Nervosa - New mental disorder aimed at people who insist on eating a clean diet

Delicious
(NaturalNews) The Food and Drug Administration went public with its doubts about the effectiveness of a relatively new breast cancer drug (1). This drug was approved in 2008 after a clinical trial showed that it slowed the progression of breast cancer tumors. Initially the drug appeared promising and it was approved for treatment of breast, lung, colon, kidney, and brain cancers. The drug was the top selling cancer treatment last year for the manufacturing company, with total sales of 5.9 billion dollars world-wide and approximately 1.2 billion of that revenue coming from its use in the treatment of breast cancer (2). Now follow-up studies are failing to show that the drug extends the lives of cancer patients and the FDA is considering withdrawing its prior recommendation of this particular drug for use in treating breast cancer.

The drug was put through an accelerated approval process back in 2008 and its continued use was contingent on later drug trials confirming its effectiveness in extending the lives of breast cancer patients. Now that this ability is in question the continued use of the drug for treating breast cancer is as well. FDA reviewers said that follow-up studies submitted to them by the pharmaceutical company failed to show that the drug extended life expectancy in breast cancer patients, saying that those studies "failed to confirm the magnitude of (progression-free survival) improvement" that was seen in earlier breast cancer trials.

Early trials showed that patients' progression-free survival rate increased by 5.5 months on the drug in question. In later studies these numbers ranged from one month to under three months, which is not considered clinically meaningful.

Additionally, patients taking the tumor-starving drug showed potentially serious side effects, which included high blood pressure, fatigue, and problems with white blood cell levels (3). Other risks include gastrointestinal perforations, blood clots, and bleeds, when the drug is combined with chemotherapy treatment; these are risks the FDA is not certain are worth the potential benefits.

The FDA asked a panel of outside experts to analyze the data on the drug, and the outcome is expected to heavily influence the FDA's final decision about the drug. It is not expected that this cancer treatment will be removed from the market entirely, but its use in treating advanced breast cancer may no longer be recommended.

References:

1.http://tinyurl.com/2dgu4uj
2.http://tinyurl.com/24x5mju
3.http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2010-07-...


About the author

Megan Rostollan is a Certified Family Herbalist and works with her husband David, a private natural health and nutrition consultant (www.reforminghealth.com). She is also the author of a blog which can be found at NaturalHousewifery.com. Her areas of greatest interest include women's reproductive and prenatal health, as well as organic and green living and dietary and lifestyle changes.


Join over four million monthly readers. Your privacy is protected. Unsubscribe at any time.
comments powered by Disqus
Take Action: Support NaturalNews.com by linking back to this article from your website

Permalink to this article:

Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):

Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use OK, cite NaturalNews.com with clickable link.

Follow Natural News on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, and Pinterest

Colloidal Silver

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Support NaturalNews Sponsors:

Advertise with NaturalNews...

GET SHOW DETAILS
+ a FREE GIFT

Sign up for the FREE Natural News Email Newsletter

Receive breaking news on GMOs, vaccines, fluoride, radiation protection, natural cures, food safety alerts and interviews with the world's top experts on natural health and more.

Join over 7 million monthly readers of NaturalNews.com, the internet's No. 1 natural health news site. (Source: Alexa.com)

Your email address *

Please enter the code you see above*

No Thanks

Already have it and love it!

Natural News supports and helps fund these organizations:

* Required. Once you click submit, we will send you an email asking you to confirm your free registration. Your privacy is assured and your information is kept confidential. You may unsubscribe at anytime.