risk

Genetic Screening No Use in Predicting Heart Attack Risk

Sunday, March 15, 2009 by: David Gutierrez, staff writer
Tags: genetic screening, health news, Natural News

eTrust Pro Certified

Most Viewed Articles
Popular on Facebook
Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 now clearly a government cover-up: All evidence contradicts official story
White House admits staging fake vaccination operation to gather DNA from the public
10 other companies that use the same Subway yoga mat chemical in their buns
High-dose vitamin C injections shown to annihilate cancer
Irrefutable proof we are all being sprayed with poison: 571 tons of toxic lead 'chemtrailed' into America's skies every year
EXCLUSIVE: Natural News tests flu vaccine for heavy metals, finds 25,000 times higher mercury level than EPA limit for water
Truvia sweetener a powerful pesticide; scientists shocked as fruit flies die in less than a week from eating GMO-derived erythritol
Senator who attacked Doctor Oz over dietary supplements received over $146,000 in campaign contributions from Big Pharma mega-retailer and Monsanto
Global warming data FAKED by government to fit climate change fictions
U.S. treating meat with ammonia, bleach and antibiotics to kill the '24-hour sickness'
HOAX confirmed: Michelle Obama 'GMOs for children' campaign a parody of modern agricultural politics
Ben and Jerry's switches to non-GMO, Fair Trade ice cream ingredients
Battle for humanity nearly lost: global food supply deliberately engineered to end life, not nourish it
Diet soda, aspartame linked to premature deaths in women
Cannabis kicks Lyme disease to the curb
Elliot Rodger, like nearly all young killers, was taking psychiatric drugs (Xanax)
Harvard research links fluoridated water to ADHD, mental disorders
Right to farm being stripped from Americans: Michigan to criminalize small family farms with chickens, goats, honey bees and more
Delicious
(NaturalNews) Genetic screening for the trait most strongly linked to early heart attacks does not, in fact, improve the ability to predict the risk of heart attack or other forms of cardiovascular disease, a new study has concluded.

"Once you already know the traditional risk factors, the additional information about the genetic variation doesn't help any," lead researcher Nina Paynter said. "It doesn't improve your ability to predict."

The trait in question is a type of genetic variation known as a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), occurring on chromosome 9. The variation, 9p21, is currently the strongest known genetic predictor of early heart attack. Although scientists are still unsure exactly what the function is of the gene that 9p21 is located in, carrying one copy of the genetic trait is believed to be associated with a 20 percent increased risk of early heart attack. The trait has also been associated with a significantly increased risk of other forms of cardiovascular disease, such as stroke, abdominal aortic aneurysm and intracranial aneurysm.

With genetic screening increasingly entering the public consciousness, some businesses have started offering commercial 9p21 screenings, purporting to help people estimate their heart attack risk. In the current study, published in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine, researchers from Brigham and Women's Hospital and Boston sought to determine if genetic screening of individuals could actually provide any predictive benefit.

"Gene patterns are associated with an increased risk of heart disease, and the higher risk patterns are common," Paynter said. "However, it was not known if knowledge of a person's pattern, when added to knowledge of traditional risk factors including family history of heart disease, would improve the ability to predict levels of future heart disease risk for that person and possibly help with treatment decisions."

In the end, knowing 9p21 status provided no benefit over knowledge of risk factors such as family history, blood pressure, cholesterol, diabetes status, smoking status and even levels of the arterial inflammation marker C-reactive protein.

The researchers assessed the 9p21 status of 22,129 white female health care professionals in the United States, along with several well-known cardiovascular risk factors. They then followed the participants for 10.2 years. All participants were free of major chronic disease at the beginning of the study.

The presence of 9p21 did, as in prior studies, correlate with a 25 to 30 percent higher risk of cardiovascular disease. This predictive effect was dwarfed, however, by those of other risk factors. When 9p21 status was incorporated into two common cardiovascular risk assessments, it only marginally improved accuracy in one test, while actually worsening it in the other.

"It seems unlikely that screening for SNPs in this region will be clinically useful in daily practice," the researchers concluded.

While the current study looked at the population-level value of 9p21 testing in predicting cardiovascular disease, Paynter noted that the tests are not useful for individuals, either.

"On a personal level, having the 9p21 variation tells you that your own personal risk is increased, but in middle age, women are at a fairly low risk anyway, and that 20 percent increased risk doesn't bump you up to medium or high risk for cardiovascular disease," she said. "For most people, it just puts you at a slightly higher, very low risk."

According to many scientists, the study calls into question the utility of genetic screening for chronic disease risk, in general.

"It's an important study that should give us pause that information about whether our DNA will trump what we know from established risk factors," said Harlan M. Krumholz of Yale University. "The genetic work is important in efforts to find targets for future therapies, but addressing modifiable risk factors is where we need to direct our attention."

Sources for this story include: www.reuters.com; www.washingtonpost.com; www.modernmedicine.com; www.theheart.org.

Join over four million monthly readers. Your privacy is protected. Unsubscribe at any time.
comments powered by Disqus
Take Action: Support NaturalNews.com by linking back to this article from your website

Permalink to this article:

Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):

Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use OK, cite NaturalNews.com with clickable link.

Follow Natural News on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, and Pinterest

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Support NaturalNews Sponsors:

Advertise with NaturalNews...

GET SHOW DETAILS
+ a FREE GIFT

Sign up for the FREE Natural News Email Newsletter

Receive breaking news on GMOs, vaccines, fluoride, radiation protection, natural cures, food safety alerts and interviews with the world's top experts on natural health and more.

Join over 7 million monthly readers of NaturalNews.com, the internet's No. 1 natural health news site. (Source: Alexa.com)

Your email address *

Please enter the code you see above*

No Thanks

Already have it and love it!

Natural News supports and helps fund these organizations:

* Required. Once you click submit, we will send you an email asking you to confirm your free registration. Your privacy is assured and your information is kept confidential. You may unsubscribe at anytime.