Email this article to a friend

Printable Version

Articles Related to This Article: • Research Biased on Harmful Chemical BPA, New Report States • Six Baby Bottle Manufacturers Quietly Agree to Remove Bisphenol-A (BPA) from Baby Bottles • FDA Declares Bisphenol-A Plastics Chemical Safe Enough for Babies to Drink Sign the Health Revolution Petition Join the call for genuine health freedom in America. End FDA tyranny and Big Pharma corruption. Watch the video and sign the petition here.

(NaturalNews) In the wake of breaking new evidence, the United States government is expressing concern over the safety of the controversial chemical bisphenol-A as Health Canada designates it a dangerous substance.

Bisphenol-A is a chemical used in the manufacture of common polycarbonate plastic products including baby and water bottles. Commonly referred to as BPA, the chemical has long drawn criticism from health advocates and environmentalists alike. BPA has a tendency to leach into food and liquid held in contaminated containers, and as a result it has been found in the body of almost 100% of young children in randomized populations.

A study done by the U.S. National Toxicology Program -- a division of the National Institutes of Health -- examined the biological effects of the substance in laboratory animals. The researchers found that BPA caused precancerous tumors, urinary tract issues, and early onset puberty in mice at low level exposure. This evidence lends itself to the argument that BPA is a contributing factor behind the progressively higher numbers of children experiencing early onset puberty, which has even been reported in children as young as three. The agency made the conservative announcement that this study provides evidence which, while limited, "cannot be dismissed."

Following the announcement, Health Canada has set the stage for a ban by designating BPA a 'dangerous substance,' while major U.S. retailers such as Wal-Mart are announcing that BPA-free baby bottles and other products will soon be on the shelves, citing consumer concern as their motivation.

"We're hoping this decision will force the FDA to recognize the toxicity of this chemical and make manufacturers set a safety standard that's protective of the most vulnerable populations," remarked Anila Jacobs of the Environmental Working Group. A U.S. ban does not seem imminent at this time, but Senator Chuck Schumer (D – NY) is expected to introduce such legislation to congress by the end of April. "There's enough warning signs to show the need to act sooner than later," the senator explained.

Industry trade group the American Chemistry Council (ACC) is holding to their previous position, stating that the study confirmed that current exposure is too low to cause problems, and that the story is simply being overblown by the media. This is hardly enough to curb the increasingly fiery calls from consumer groups and others who wish to see the potentially dangerous substance banned.

About the author

Related CounterThink Cartoons:

Related Articles: • Research Biased on Harmful Chemical BPA, New Report States • Six Baby Bottle Manufacturers Quietly Agree to Remove Bisphenol-A (BPA) from Baby Bottles • FDA Declares Bisphenol-A Plastics Chemical Safe Enough for Babies to Drink	Take Action: Support NaturalNews.com Email this article to a friend Share this article on: NewsVine | digg | del.icio.us Permalink to this article: http://www.NaturalNews.com/023303_Bisphenol-A_BPA_health.html Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK, cite NaturalNews.com with clickable link. Embed article link: (copy HTML code below): <a href = "http://www.NaturalNews.com/023303_Bisphenol-A_BPA_health.html">Bisphenol-A Under Scrutiny, Bans Considered</a>