nuclear

Small-scale nuclear war could devastate global environment for years, researchers say

Monday, December 18, 2006 by: Ben Kage
Tags: nuclear war, climate change, nuclear weapons

eTrust Pro Certified

Most Viewed Articles
Popular on Facebook
CDC issues flu vaccine apology: this year's vaccine doesn't work!
Biologist explains how marijuana causes tumor cells to commit suicide
Depopulation test run? 75% of children who received vaccines in Mexican town now dead or hospitalized
BAM! Chipotle goes 100% non-GMO; flatly rejecting the biotech industry and its toxic food ingredients
Companies begin planting microchips under employees' skin
U2's Bono partners with Monsanto to destroy African agriculture with GMOs
NJ cops bust teenagers shoveling snow without a permit
Russia throws down the gauntlet: energy supply to Europe cut off; petrodollar abandoned as currency war escalates
McDonald's in global profit free fall as people everywhere increasingly reject chemically-altered toxic fast food
Chemotherapy kills cancer patients faster than no treatment at all
Why flu shots are the greatest medical fraud in history
600 strains of an aerosolized thought control vaccine already tested on humans; deployed via air, food and water
Flu vaccine kills 13 in Italy; death toll rises
Italian court rules mercury and aluminum in vaccines cause autism: US media continues total blackout of medical truth
The 21 curious questions we're never allowed to ask about vaccines
Vicious attack on Dr. Oz actually waged by biotech mafia; plot to destroy Oz launched after episode on glyphosate toxicity went viral
Orthorexia Nervosa - New mental disorder aimed at people who insist on eating a clean diet
Whooping cough outbreak at Massachusetts high school affected only vaccinated students

Delicious
(NaturalNews) The environmental impacts of a nuclear war -- nuclear winter, decades of radiation fallout -- are terrifying enough, but a team of researchers concluded today that even a small-scale, regional nuclear war could vastly disrupt the global climate for a decade or longer.

"Considering the relatively small number and size of the weapons, the effects are surprisingly large," said Richard Turco, a researcher from the University of California, Los Angeles. "The potential devastation would be catastrophic and long term."

According to the report presented yesterday at the annual meeting of the American Geophysical Union, the initial effects of a Hiroshima-sized detonation could be as many fatalities as all of World War II, and then the environment could be affected in ways never considered. The scientists said that large areas of the planet could drastically drop in temperature if a nuclear detonation occurred.

"It would be the largest climate change in recorded human history," said team member Alan Robock, associate director of the Center for Environmental Prediction at Rutgers' Cook College.

A team from the University of Colorado, Boulder focused their attention on the black smoke that would be created by a nuclear detonation, and the subsequent firestorms, basing their research on current population densities in large cities worldwide and current nuclear weapon inventories. They found that each country would sustain fatalities ranging from 2.6 million to 16.7 million people.

"A small country is likely to direct its weapons against population centers to maximize damage and achieve the greatest advantage," said lead researcher Owen "Brian" Toon.

Robock and his team used computer simulations of a conflict between India and Pakistan, for example, to analyze potential climate changes caused by a regional nuclear war. In the simulations, each combatant used 50 nuclear weapons on the other country. The smoke caused by such a battle would settle in the Earth's upper atmosphere -- where some rays from the sun are usually absorbed -- and greatly diffuse the sunlight before it hits the surface. The shroud would cause lower temperatures, darkness, reduced precipitation, and ozone depletion.

The team said, in the Pakistan/India example, the smoke could drop average temperatures by 2 degrees Fahrenheit as far away as North America and Eurasia. Ten years later, the simulated climate had not recovered from the war. Previous studies had analyzed what would happen if countries fired their entire nuclear arsenals at each other, but the recent study accounts for three-hundredths of a percent of that global arsenal.

The scientists said they were hopeful that positive change would come from their conclusion.

"We certainly hope there will be a political response because nuclear weapons are the most dangerous potential environmental danger to the planet." Robock said. "They're much more dangerous than global warming."

###

Join over four million monthly readers. Your privacy is protected. Unsubscribe at any time.
comments powered by Disqus
Take Action: Support NaturalNews.com by linking back to this article from your website

Permalink to this article:

Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):

Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use OK, cite NaturalNews.com with clickable link.

Follow Natural News on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, and Pinterest

Colloidal Silver

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Support NaturalNews Sponsors:

Advertise with NaturalNews...

GET SHOW DETAILS
+ a FREE GIFT

Sign up for the FREE Natural News Email Newsletter

Receive breaking news on GMOs, vaccines, fluoride, radiation protection, natural cures, food safety alerts and interviews with the world's top experts on natural health and more.

Join over 7 million monthly readers of NaturalNews.com, the internet's No. 1 natural health news site. (Source: Alexa.com)

Your email address *

Please enter the code you see above*

No Thanks

Already have it and love it!

Natural News supports and helps fund these organizations:

* Required. Once you click submit, we will send you an email asking you to confirm your free registration. Your privacy is assured and your information is kept confidential. You may unsubscribe at anytime.