cancer

Pink products are little more than clever advertising for breast cancer, health author says

Thursday, October 12, 2006 by: Jessica Fraser
Tags: breast cancer, cancer industry, disease mongering

eTrust Pro Certified

Most Viewed Articles
Popular on Facebook
Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 now clearly a government cover-up: All evidence contradicts official story
White House admits staging fake vaccination operation to gather DNA from the public
10 other companies that use the same Subway yoga mat chemical in their buns
High-dose vitamin C injections shown to annihilate cancer
Irrefutable proof we are all being sprayed with poison: 571 tons of toxic lead 'chemtrailed' into America's skies every year
EXCLUSIVE: Natural News tests flu vaccine for heavy metals, finds 25,000 times higher mercury level than EPA limit for water
Truvia sweetener a powerful pesticide; scientists shocked as fruit flies die in less than a week from eating GMO-derived erythritol
Senator who attacked Doctor Oz over dietary supplements received over $146,000 in campaign contributions from Big Pharma mega-retailer and Monsanto
Global warming data FAKED by government to fit climate change fictions
HOAX confirmed: Michelle Obama 'GMOs for children' campaign a parody of modern agricultural politics
U.S. treating meat with ammonia, bleach and antibiotics to kill the '24-hour sickness'
Ben and Jerry's switches to non-GMO, Fair Trade ice cream ingredients
Battle for humanity nearly lost: global food supply deliberately engineered to end life, not nourish it
Russia taking McDonald's to court, threatens countrywide shutdown
Diet soda, aspartame linked to premature deaths in women
Cannabis kicks Lyme disease to the curb
Elliot Rodger, like nearly all young killers, was taking psychiatric drugs (Xanax)
Harvard research links fluoridated water to ADHD, mental disorders
Delicious
(NaturalNews) Since October is national Breast Cancer Awareness Month, a host of companies have jumped on the "pink" bandwagon, selling everything from vacuums to dog treats in pink packaging with a promise to donate some proceeds to breast cancer research, but critics of the cancer treatment industry say pink products are just free advertising for companies seeking to attract buyers shopping for a cause.

"You can cook for the cure, shop for the cure -- why don't we have the cure yet?" asked Barbara Brenner, executive director of Breast Cancer Action, a San Francisco-based advocacy group.

While some companies make sizeable donations for every "pink" purchase -- such as Clinique, which donates $10 of every $14 "In the Pink" lipstick sale to the Breast Cancer Research Foundation -- other companies only donate a couple cents per dollar or transaction.

Breast Cancer Action is running a "Think Before You Pink" campaign asking consumers to question breast cancer charities and their corporate partners before spending money on pink products. A 2002 ad the group ran in the New York Times pointed out that Eureka donated less than 1 percent from the sale of its "Clean for the Cure" vacuum, while American Express donated only a penny per transaction of any amount during its "Charge for the Cure" campaign.

"It's rarely more than a penny on the dollar," said Trent Stamp, executive director of Charity Navigator, a charity watchdog group. "It's just great advertising."

Consumer advocate Mike Adams, a vocal critic of mainstream cancer treatments, said companies selling pink products are not held accountable for their promised donations, and consumers are largely unaware of how much of their purchase is actually donated.

"For most pink products, only a tiny percentage of the product price is donated to cancer research," Adams said. "Buying a pink can of soup, for example, may result in two cents being donated."

Daniel Borochoff of the American Institute of Philanthropy, says companies often use meaningless phrases such as "net profits to charity" or "a portion of proceeds go to charity," to help sell pink products. In reality, "pink" donation promises may only last for an unspecified limited time, or a certain sales target must be reached before donations are triggered, Borochoff said.

"There's no accountability on where the money goes or how it is used," Adams said. "Where are the anti-cancer education programs that teach women nutrition?"

Brenner says consumers must "engage in meaningful activity" to solve the problem of breast cancer. "If you think you're going to solve the problem by buying Yoplait, you've got another thing coming."

###

Join over four million monthly readers. Your privacy is protected. Unsubscribe at any time.
comments powered by Disqus
Take Action: Support NaturalNews.com by linking back to this article from your website

Permalink to this article:

Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):

Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use OK, cite NaturalNews.com with clickable link.

Follow Natural News on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, and Pinterest

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Support NaturalNews Sponsors:

Advertise with NaturalNews...

GET SHOW DETAILS
+ a FREE GIFT

Sign up for the FREE Natural News Email Newsletter

Receive breaking news on GMOs, vaccines, fluoride, radiation protection, natural cures, food safety alerts and interviews with the world's top experts on natural health and more.

Join over 7 million monthly readers of NaturalNews.com, the internet's No. 1 natural health news site. (Source: Alexa.com)

Your email address *

Please enter the code you see above*

No Thanks

Already have it and love it!

Natural News supports and helps fund these organizations:

* Required. Once you click submit, we will send you an email asking you to confirm your free registration. Your privacy is assured and your information is kept confidential. You may unsubscribe at anytime.