Summary
Vonage Holdings Corp., the nation's largest voice over IP (VoIP) provider, discovered that a local telephone company was blocking access to Vonage's data stream, and they have called for the FCC to investigate. With local carriers providing internet access, concerns about back room deals to block or disrupt connections to web sites or VoIP networks have risen to the fore.
Original source:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A31082-2005Feb16.html
Details
The federal government is looking into allegations that as many as 200 people who switched from traditional telephone service to placing calls via the Internet had their new service disrupted by the local telephone company in their area.
Vonage declined to identify the phone company involved.
Vonage, along with competitors such as AT&T Corp. and a number of start-ups, is posing a growing challenge to local and regional phone providers by offering unlimited local and long-distance Internet-calling plans for as little as $20 a month.
More than 1 million consumers use VoIP, and many businesses are adopting the technology.
He said Vonage has seen a few other examples of blocking by other phone companies but did not complain about those.
The allegations could focus new legislative and regulatory attention on a long-simmering issue: whether the small number of phone and cable giants that provide high-speed Internet access to most of the country might undermine, degrade or discriminate against content that relies on their networks to reach homes and businesses.
With telephone companies' land-based service under siege by wireless and VoIP and cable firms also eyeing the Internet telephone market, VoIP providers that rely on consumers' Internet connections are one obvious potential target.
They fear a scenario in which the network owners cut deals with certain vendors of Internet content so that their information gets to consumers faster, or with higher quality, at the expense of others.
Citron, who said
Vonage was able to route its customers' calls around the phone company's blocks, regards it as a form of censorship.
The major phone and cable companies have said that regulation is unnecessary because they have no plans to discriminate and that the problem was purely hypothetical.
About the author: Mike Adams is a natural health researcher, author and award-winning journalist with a passion for sharing empowering information to help improve personal and planetary health He has authored and published thousands of articles, interviews, consumers guides, and books on topics like health and the environment, and he has authored and published several downloadable personal preparedness courses including a downloadable course focused on safety and self defense. Adams is a trusted, independent journalist who receives no money or promotional fees whatsoever to write about other companies' products. In 2010, Adams launched TV.NaturalNews.com, a natural health video site featuring videos on holistic health and green living. He's also the founder of a well known HTML email software company whose 'Email Marketing Director' software currently runs the NaturalNews subscription database. Adams is currently the executive director of the Consumer Wellness Center, a 501(c)3 non-profit, and enjoys outdoor activities, nature photography, Pilates and martial arts training. He's also author a large number of health books offered by Truth Publishing and is the creator of numerous reference website including NaturalPedia.com and the free downloadable Honest Food Guide. His websites also include the free reference sites HerbReference.com and HealingFoodReference.com. Adams believes in free speech, free access to nutritional supplements and the innate healing ability of the human body.
Have comments on this article? Post them here:
people have commented on this article.
Sunday, February 27, 2005
Email this article to a friend
Share
this article on: 
